East Africa Spotlighted: Burundi Alone in Trump’s New U.S. Travel Ban

June 11, 2025


Burundi, an East African country, stands alone as the sole exception under the recent U.S. immigration travel ban imposed by the Trump administration, which has designated only seven nations for these partial travel limitations to the United States.

Uniquely among its neighbors, Burundi remains distinct within the Great Lakes region with this particular classification.

Although Somalia and Sudan—both located in the Horn of Africa—are subject to a complete travel ban according to the new decree, neighboring countries like Uganda, Rwanda, Democratic Republic of Congo, Kenya, and Tanzania have been exempted altogether.

The policy, scheduled to begin on June 9th, marks the second significant travel restriction implemented during Donald Trump’s presidency. It mirrors his earlier measures which focused primarily on countries with predominantly Muslim populations.

Trump announced the new ban while invoking a recent attack in Colorado, where 12 people were injured during a pro-Israel gathering.

Even though an individual from Egypt was accused in relation to the event, Egypt did not appear on the list of restricted nations.

In place of this, the White House issued a statement detailing 12 nations subject to complete travel bans—namely Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo (Congo-Brazzaville), Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen—as well as an additional group of seven countries such as Burundi, which will be subjected to partial limitations.

Trump said the decision was based on national security and the need to protect Americans from individuals who are not “properly vetted.”

He said during the press conference that they are not welcome, emphasizing that the U.S. will not admit visitors from countries it considers non-compliant with its screening and immigration processes.

The specifics of Burundi’s limited prohibition are unclear, however, such partial limitations typically involve stricter scrutiny, curbs on particular categories of visas, or constraints on family reunion and diversity lottery programs.

_____________________________________________


Total ban:

• Afghanistan • Burma • Chad • Congo • Eritrea • Haiti • Iran • Libya • Somalia • Sudan • Yemen • Equatorial Guinea


Partially restricted countries:

• Burundi • Cuba • Laos • Sierra Leone • Turkmenistan • Venezuela • Togo

_____________________________________________

In stark contrast, nations such as Somalia and Sudan endure comprehensive bans on both immigrant and non-immigrant travel.

Analysts across the region are questioning why Burundi, a landlocked country with relatively low emigration rates to the US, has been targeted.

This could indicate either diplomatic isolation or tense ties with Washington,” stated an East African diplomat who wished to remain anonymous.

The current lack of significant security issues coming from Burundi makes its presence somewhat confusing.

Other nations experiencing partial bans include Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela. These countries share neither geographical nor political ties with Burundi, fueling speculations about the distinctive reasoning behind such actions.

Critics of the policy have called it arbitrary and discriminatory. Robyn Barnard, a senior counsel with Human Rights First in Washington DC, said the selection of countries under the ban lacks coherence.

“Many of these countries are places people flee due to conflict, repression, or rights abuses,” she told the BBC.

This seems more like a form of punishment rather than a proper policy.

The Trump administration asserts that the list may be modified based on each nation’s readiness to adhere to U.S. immigration and security requirements. According to a White House announcement, “senior officials will promptly interact” with the relevant countries’ administrations to address adherence issues.

However, Burundi keeps a minimal diplomatic presence in the United States and has yet to provide an official statement on the matter.

Historically, the embassy in Washington has faced challenges related to personnel and community engagement, and it is still uncertain if Bujumbura will attempt to clarify or contest its inclusion.

In the meantime, local administrations remain silent. Given the recent boost in bilateral talks between the United States and both Uganda and Rwanda, Burundi’s position on this list could be more indicative of larger global political trends rather than direct security concerns.

The travel restriction comes into force at 5 am BST on Sunday, June 9 (Monday EAT).

Unless reversed or challenged in court, it will mark a significant setback for Burundians seeking to study, reunite with family, or work in the United States–privileges that remain unaffected for their neighbours in the region.

Provided by Syndigate Media Inc. (
Syndigate.info
).

Article Categories:
africa · europe · immigration · politics · world

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *